
The empty debate on the spectacle - that is, on the activities of the world’s owners - is thus organised by the spectacle itself- everything is said about the extensive means at its disposal, to ensure that nothing is said about their extensive deployment. Rather than talk of the spectacle, people often prefer to use the term ‘media’. And by this they mean to describe a mere instrument, a kind of public service which with impartial ‘professionalism’ would facilitate the new wealth of mass communication through mass media -a form of communication which has at last attained a unilateral purity, whereby decisions already taken are presented for passive admiration. For what is communicated are orders; and with perfect harmony, those who give them are also those who tell us what they think of them.
from Comments on the Society of the Spectacle (Section III) - Guy Debord
-
dayofthedreamweavers liked this
-
negativepleasure liked this
-
obzine liked this
-
entropymorpheus liked this
-
nosex liked this
-
johnny-mnemonic reblogged this from criticalculture
-
criticalculture reblogged this from pieto
-
lf liked this
-
andrewfm liked this
-
ubu507 liked this
-
ledgergermane reblogged this from pieto
-
pieto posted this
